Key takeaways
- Cellular vs. WiFi access control differ most in reliability, with cellular offering more consistent uptime during internet outages.
- WiFi access control relies on existing network infrastructure, while cellular systems operate independently using dedicated routers.
- Cellular connectivity simplifies installation by reducing the need for IT coordination and network configuration.
- WiFi access control typically has lower monthly costs but may require ongoing network maintenance and upgrades.
- The right connectivity choice depends on your property’s infrastructure, uptime requirements, and long-term scalability needs.
Choosing the right connectivity for your access control system is no longer a purely technical decision. For property managers, it directly affects reliability, security, installation timelines, and long-term operating costs. As more access control systems move to the cloud, the question shifts from the door hardware itself to how that hardware connects to the internet.
This guide breaks down cellular vs. WiFi access control, with a specific focus on cellular and WiFi routers. The goal is to help property managers understand how each option works, where each performs best, and how to choose the right connectivity for their building.
In this post:
- Access control connectivity types
- Cellular vs. WiFi access control comparison
- Use cases for cellular vs. WiFi access control
- Choose flexibility with ButterflyMX Access Control
- Cellular vs. WiFi access control FAQs
More than 40K, 5-star reviews!
Video Intercoms
Open doors, gates & garages from anywhere.
QR Code Intercom
Smartphone-based visitor access.
Access Control
Fob, key cards, PINs, and mobile apps.
Security Cameras
Visibility throughout your property.
Vehicle Access
Hands-free access for gates & garages.
Package Room
Receive, store, and manage deliveries.
Smart Locks
Connect to all major brands and models.
Elevator Controls
Unlock key-fobbed elevators for anyone.
Front Desk Station
See all your doors and cameras in one place.
Access control connectivity types
Modern access control systems depend on an internet connection to authenticate users, sync permissions, log events, and allow remote management.
While systems are deployed in different ways, most fall into one of two connectivity categories:
WiFi-based access control
WiFi access control systems connect to the internet through a local WiFi network. This usually means that the access control panel or controller connects to a router tied into the building’s existing internet service.
In many properties, this is the same network used by office staff, residents, or other building systems. The WiFi router acts as the bridge between the access control hardware and the cloud platform that manages credentials and permissions.
Cellular-based access control
Cellular access control systems connect to the internet via a cellular network, much like a smartphone. Instead of relying on the property’s local internet, the access control system uses a cellular router with a SIM card to transmit data over LTE or 5G networks.
Cellular connectivity is often used when WiFi is unreliable, unavailable, or impractical. It is also common in properties where managers want the access control system to operate independently from other building systems.
Cellular vs. WiFi access control comparison
Choosing between cellular and WiFi access control comes down to how each connectivity option performs in real property environments. While both connect access control systems to the cloud, they differ in reliability, installation requirements, security considerations, and ongoing costs.
This comparison breaks down how cellular routers and WiFi routers stack up:
Reliability and uptime
WiFi-based systems depend on several components working together. The building’s internet service must be active. The router must be functioning. The local network must be properly configured. If any of these fail, the access control system can lose its connection to the cloud.
Cellular access control systems are typically more resilient. Because they use a dedicated cellular router, they are not affected by issues with the building’s primary internet service. If the cellular network is strong, the system remains online even when the rest of the property loses internet access.
Installation complexity
WiFi access control can be simple to install if the necessary infrastructure is already in place. If a router is nearby and the network is accessible, connecting the system may be straightforward.
Cellular access control systems usually require less coordination. The cellular router is installed alongside the access control hardware and activated with a data plan. There is no need to integrate with existing networks or request firewall changes.
Security considerations
WiFi-based systems share the building’s network, inheriting both its protections and its vulnerabilities. If the network is well managed, segmented, and monitored, this may not be an issue. But in some properties, shared networks increase the risk of unauthorized access or misconfiguration.
Cellular access control systems operate over a private connection separate from the property’s internal network. This isolation reduces exposure to internal network threats and limits the number of access points that need to be secured.
Ongoing costs
WiFi access control typically has lower recurring costs because it uses the property’s existing internet service. There may be little to no additional monthly connectivity fee.
Cellular access control requires a data plan for the cellular router. This adds a recurring cost that can range from modest to significant, depending on usage and provider.
Scalability
WiFi access control can scale well in buildings with robust network infrastructure. However, adding more doors or devices may require network upgrades, additional access points, or adjustments to bandwidth.
Cellular access control scales more predictably. Each system or group of doors can have its own dedicated connection, making it easier to expand without impacting other building systems.
Discover how ButterflyMX works:
Use cases for cellular vs. WiFi access control
When choosing between cellular and WiFi access control, there is no single best option for every property. Instead, the right choice depends on how and where the access control system will be used.
Here are three approaches when choosing between cellular and WiFi:
- When WiFi access control makes sense
- When cellular access control is the better choice
- Hybrid approaches
1. When WiFi access control makes sense
WiFi-based access control is often a good fit for properties that already have reliable internet and network management in place.
Office buildings with dedicated IT teams can maintain secure and stable networks that support access control without issue. Newer multifamily properties with modern infrastructure may also have strong WiFi coverage throughout common areas.
WiFi connectivity can be especially appealing when budgets are tight and minimizing recurring costs is a priority.
2. When cellular access control is the better choice
Cellular access control is well-suited for properties where reliability and independence are more important than minimizing monthly fees.
Older buildings often struggle with inconsistent WiFi coverage or outdated infrastructure. Remote properties may not have dependable broadband service at all.
Cellular connectivity is also ideal for properties that want to avoid involving IT teams or sharing access-control systems with resident or staff networks. Temporary installations, construction sites, and gate access points are common examples.
For property managers overseeing multiple locations, cellular access control can simplify deployments by standardizing connectivity across the portfolio.
3. Hybrid approaches
Some properties use a combination of WiFi and cellular connectivity. For example, a building may rely on WiFi for interior doors while using cellular routers for exterior entrances or gates.
This approach allows managers to balance cost and reliability based on the criticality of each access point.
Choose flexibility with ButterflyMX Access Control
For property managers weighing cellular vs. WiFi access control, the real challenge is finding a system that works reliably across different buildings, infrastructure limitations, and portfolio needs. ButterflyMX stands out because it is designed to remove connectivity headaches rather than add to them.
ButterflyMX Access Control Systems are built with flexibility in mind. They support both cellular and Wi-Fi connectivity, allowing property managers to choose the option that best fits each building rather than forcing a one-size-fits-all approach.
In properties with unreliable internet or limited IT support, cellular connectivity via third-party cellular routers keeps entrances online and manageable at all times. Furthermore, in buildings with strong network infrastructure, WiFi can be used without sacrificing performance or visibility.
Cellular vs. WiFi access control FAQs
- Does WiFi access control stop working during an internet outage?
- Are cellular routers secure enough for access control?
- Can a property switch from WiFi to cellular later?
Does WiFi access control stop working during an internet outage?
Most modern systems can continue to grant local access during short outages, but remote management, real-time updates, and cloud-based features may remain unavailable until the connection is restored.
Are cellular routers secure enough for access control?
Routers used for access control typically use encrypted connections and private networks. Because they are isolated from the building’s internal network, they can reduce certain security risks.
Can a property switch from WiFi to cellular later?
In many cases, yes. Some access control systems are designed to support both connectivity types. Property managers should confirm compatibility and hardware requirements before making a change.
Get your free quote!
Fill in the form below, and we'll email you right back.
Want a free quote?
Fill in the form below, and we'll email you right back.
You’ll be redirected shortly...